Nuclear Information and Resource Service home


 
Share |
Radioactive Waste Project - home


Take Action!


Campaigns


Nuclear Monitor

 

Nuclear Crisis in Japan

Also follow us on:
dailykos NIRS blog    Youtube

 

twitter
 

Reprocessing

 

June 22, 2011: NIRS participates in NRC Stakeholder meeting on possible new rule to license reprocessing and associated activities. Workshop documents and additional information about how to weigh in on it here.

December 9, 2008: 50+ organizations urge Obama to end Bush’s GNEP and reprocessing programs. PDF

Research Report No. 5, International Panel on Fissile Materials. The Legacy of Reprocessing in the United Kingdom. PDF Martin Forwood. July 2008.

Reprocessing: Dangerous, Dirty and Expensive; Why Extracting Plutonium from Nuclear Reactor Spent Fuel is a Bad Idea. PDF Fact sheet from Union of Concerned Scientists. May 2008

The Global Nuclear Energy Partnership. Greenpeace US fact sheet on President Bush's GNEP program and nuclear fuel reprocessing. PDF 2008

A major new report on the French reprocessing program from the International Panel on Fissile Materials finds that it does not reduce volume of radioactive waste and would have to be half its current cost to be economically competitive with storage of the waste, thus undercutting the Bush administration’s major arguments for reprocessing. May 14, 2008.

March 31, 2008: New report slams President Bush’s Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) program, finding—among other problems--that no economic cost-benefit analysis has been done, the technologies proposed do not exist, and the program would be too slow and expensive to address climate change. Report is from Institute for Policy Studies, Friends of the Earth, Government Accountability Project and Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. PDF

May 23, 2007: 30 minute television interview hosted by Dave Kraft of Nuclear Energy Information Service of Chicago, with guests Shaun Burnie (European nuclear waste consultant) and Aileen Mioko Smith (of Green Action in Kyoto, Japan) on the many risks of commercial nuclear waste reprocessing under the Bush Administration's Global Nuclear Energy Partnership proposal.

 

West Valley Nuclear Site “Cleanup” 1996 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

January 26, 2006: 28 groups write to all 535 Members of Congress urging opposition to the reprocessing relapse

January 23, 2006: Federal Decision Triples Radioactive Burden In Permanent Sacrifice Zone of the Southeast. NIRS Southeast press release.

January, 2006. Reprocessing is NOT the Solution to the Nuclear Waste Problem. PDF NIRS factsheet.

October 20, 2005: Group Letter to Energy & Water Appropriations Conferees: Oppose Interim Storage & Reprocessing of Nuclear Waste.

Urge your Member of Congress to oppose pro-reprocessing and Mobile Chernobyl language in the House Energy & Water Appropriations Bill by supporting the Spratt and Markey-Holt Amendments. NIRS Action Alert. May 24, 2005.

Radioactive Waste Reprocessing. PDF 12KB NIRS factsheet. May 2005.

Great Lakes United Resolution on West Valley Nuclear Wastes. June 2004

Natural Resources Defense Council letter to U.S. Senator Lindsay Graham ( PDF 1207.83KB1,18Mb)(R-SC) urging him to desist from sponsoring DOE-written legislation enabling the abandonment of high-level radioactive waste from reprocessing in underground storage containers next to major rivers and above major aquifers, May 12, 2004

Related Links

Alliance for Nuclear Accountability’s web page has lots of info on DOE trying to abandon HLRW in South Carolina and Idaho (and maybe someday Washington and New York).

IEER - have done work on La Hague, France and Sellafield, UK (Cumbrians Opposed to a Radioactive Environement, for example).

Excellent compilation of background information opposing Bush’s Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) and a relapse into commercial high-level radioactive waste reprocessing.

January 26, 2006: 20+ groups warn Congress against Bush Administration reprocessing initiative