IF S, 104 IS GOOD FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, AS THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY CLAIMS, A LOT OF ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS MUST SUPPORT IT, RIGHT?

HERE IS THE COMPLETE LIST:

THE FOLLOWING ENVIRONMENTAL AND CITIZENS GROUPS ARE AGAINST S. 104 (and S. 1936):

Nuclear Information and Resource Service * Greenpeace * League of Conservation Voters

Public Citizen * U.S. Public Interest Research Group * Physicians for Social Responsibility

Sierra Club * Military Production Network * Natural Resources Defense Council

Office for Church in Society, United Church of Christ * Project on Government Oversight

League of Women Voters of the United States * Union of American Hebrew Congregations

United Methodist General Board of Church and Society * Nuclear Free America

National Ministries of the Presbyterian Church (USA) *Nuclear Waste Citizens' Coalition

Safe Energy Communication Council * Friends of the Earth

Citizens Awareness Network * Missouri Coalition for the Environment

20/20 Vision * Prairie Island Coalition * Environmental Action *Native Youth Alliance

Nuclear Control Institute *Clearwater * Citizens for Alternatives to Chemical Contamination

Rocky Mountain Peace Center * Snake River Alliance * Citizen Alert * Redwood Alliance

National Environmental Coalition of Native Americans * Campaign for Nevada's Future

Southwest Research and Information Center * Clean Water Action * Free the Planet

Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League * Kansas Sierra Club * Envirovideo

Kansas Natural Resource Council * Greens/Green Party USA * Fellowship of Reconciliation

Good Money, Inc. * Wyoming Outdoor Council * Nuclear Resister * Three Mile Island Alert

Western North Carolina Alliance * GE Stockholders Alliance * The Peace Farm

Tennessee Valley Energy Reform Coalition * C-10 Research and Education Foundation

Northwest Environmental Advocates * Oyster Creek Nuclear Watch * Green Party of Ohio

Grass Roots Environmental Organization * Physicians for Social Responsibility, Los Angeles

Alliance to Close Indian Point * Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Louisiana

Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy * Wilmington College Peace Resource Center

Student Environmental Action Coalition, U. of Wisconsin, Milwaukee * Orange County Greens

U. of Florida Environmental Action Group * Eco-Action, Penn State U. * Austin Greens

Student Environmental Action Coalition, U. of Northern Iowa * Grandmothers for Peace

Los Gatos Unitarian Fellowship * Alliance for Survival * Nuclear Democracy Network

Stop the Organizations Raping Mankind * Pennsylvania Environmental Network

Heart of America Northwest * Desert Citizens Against Pollution * Eco Sense, American U.

California Communities Against Toxics * Nuclear Energy Information Service

Nuclear Age Peace Foundation * People's Action for Clean Energy * Iowans for Nuclear Safety

New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution * Physicians for Social Responsibility, Kansas

Student Environmental Action Coalition, U. of Delaware * St. Joseph Valley Greens

Economists Allied for Arms Reduction * Kwanitewk Native Resource Network

Physicians for Social Responsibility, Atlanta * Los Alamos Study Group * Abalone Alliance

Fernald Residents for Environment, Safety & Health * Womens Action for New Directions

STAND * Center for Energy Research * Humans Against Nuclear Waste Dumps, Mescalero

Physicians for Social Responsibility, Colorado * American Friends Service Committee, Denver

North American Water Office * Students for Social Responsibility, CalPoly

War & Peace Foundation * North Carolina Waste Awareness & Reduction Network

Ohio Sierra Club Nuclear Issues Committee * Downwinders * Women's Environment & Development Organization * Mississippi River Basin Alliance * Ygdrasil Institute

NukeWatch * WESPAC (Westchester People's Action Coalition) * Oregon PeaceWorks

San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace * International Institute of Concern for Public Health

Save Ward Valley * GRACE Public Fund (Global Resource Action Center for the Environment)

Environmental Defense Institute * Citizens Regulatory Commission

The ZHABA Collective * Northeast Ohio Greens * Arizona Safe Energy Coalition

Indian Point Project * No Escape * Citizens at Risk: Cape Cod * E-3, Wesleyan University

Wolf Creek Citizens Watchdog Group * Indigenous Environmental Network

Pax Christi USA * University of Maine Student Government

Women Speak out for Peace & Justice/Women's Int'l League for Peace & Freedom, Cleveland Branch

South Dakota Resources Coalition * Environmental Health Network

So are the cities of Los Angeles, Denver, St. Louis, Philadelphia, Decatur, GA, Mt. Rainier, Takoma Park & Greenbelt, MD, Beacon, NY, Falls Township, PA, Amherst, MA, Wadesboro, NC and Ventura, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara (CA), Marshall, Anson (NC), and Bucks (PA) counties.

And, according to a December 1995 poll, 70% of the American people.

S. 104 overrides environmental laws, pre-empts state environmental laws and regulations, weakens radiation protection standards, makes taxpayers liable for nuclear waste accidents, and threatens 50 million Americans with a Mobile Chernobyl.

S. 104: It's a disaster for the environment.

Nuclear Information & Resource Service, 1424 16th Street NW, #404, Washington DC 20036

202-328-0002; fax: 462-2183; e-mail: nirsnet@igc.apc.org web: www.nirs.org