April 20, 2007: Take Action Chernobyl Day on IAEA/WHO: Requesting solidarity actions in US and around the world, Requesting all to sign petitions, Lasting presence in front of the WHO

Demand radiation standards that follow the precautionary principle. NIRS Alert. February 21, 2007

International Commission on Radiological Protection

The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) is a self-appointed, pronuclear advocacy organization that makes recommendations on radiation standards that are often adopted by countries into enforceable regulations.

NIRS has done a 3 part series on the recommendations and encourages the public to comment. The articles from the Nuclear Monitor are here:

U.S. Perspective on Weakening of International Radiation Standards in Draft ICRP-2005. Article 1 in a Series by NIRS on Radiation Standards. Article 2 in a Series by NIRS on Radiation Standards. Article 3 in a Series by NIRS on Radiation Standards.

The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)’s proposed 2006 recommendations are being finalized and public comments taken on the www.icrp.org website until 15 Sept 2006 but late comments may be accepted since there is still a public meeting to be held OCT 24-5 in Bucharest for European input on the recommendations. The recommendations are available on the website, too and have several important weaknesses that the public can address including failure to incorporate of the Precautionary Principle; exempting radioactive waste, materials, practices and sources from regulatory control; ignoring greater damage from low-dose radiation exposures in assessing ‘acceptable’ risks and doses; suggesting setting acceptable contamination levels for animals, plants and ecosystems; recommending against estimating the numbers of cancers caused by radiation exposures to large populations and to people far into the future; failing to protect the most vulnerable in the population by ignoring some and averaging the risk estimates over women and men and age groups; continuing to ignore non-cancer health effects and (relatively) new biology such as the bystander effect and genomic instability in estimating risks.

Comments of Nuclear Information and Resource Service (NIRS) on International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)’s proposed 2006 recommendations
DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION
02/276/06- 5 JUNE 2006

These are some of NIRS written comments that supplemented verbal presentations and participation at the North American meeting 28-29 August 2006 of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency to gather input on the ICRP 2006 recommendations.

The document and comments can be also viewed, and additional comments submitted on the ICRP website at www.icrp.org.

1998 Comments (still relevant today) by Mary Olson on current radiation standards and why they are not conservative / protective enough.

EPA Moves to Relax US Radiation Standards

The EPA has statutory responsibility to protect the public from ionizing radiation. The EPA Office of Radiation and Indoor Air is requesting and getting support from its Radiation Advisory Committee (of Scientific Advisory Board RAC SAB) to change EPA’s existing (albeit old) risk estimates but instead of making them more protective, as would be expected after the NAS BEIR VII committee revealed that radiation is 30% more risky than previously known, some of the risk estimates are being weakened. NIRS, Public Citizen and Committee to Bridge the Gap determined that in 27 of 28 comparisons between the NAS BEIR VII findings and the EPA recommendations, the EPA proposals were more lax (i.e. would result in more risk to the public). Bridge the Gap, Nuclear Information and Resource Service, and Public Citizen made a statement at the first public meeting of the EPA (RAC SAB ) to consider the White Paper proposed by EPA’s Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (ORIA).

Dirty Bomb Cleanup Guidance

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY PROPOSES
LETTING PUBLIC BE EXPOSED TO MASSIVE RADIATION DOSES FROM “DIRTY BOMBS”.

Comments due March 6, 2006

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued guidance for responding to a terrorist detonation of a radiological weapon, a so-called “dirty bomb.” In that guidance, DHS proposes permitting the public back into a contaminated area even if radiation doses are as high as 10,000 millirem per year. Over 30 years of exposure, that is the equivalent of 50,000 chest X-rays. The government’s own official risk estimates say such exposure would cause cancer in a quarter of the people exposed.

Write DHS to oppose long-term cleanup standards for dirty bombs with radiation levels higher than what EPA permits for the most contaminated Superfund sites in the country.

Email FEMA-RULES@dhs.gov; fax 202-646-4536; mail to Rules Docket Clerk, Office of general Counsel, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Room 840, 500 C Street, SW., Washington DC 20472; or comment via http://www.regulations.gov. Identify your comments with Docket Number DHS-2004-0029 and Z-RIN 1660-ZA02.

For more information, see April 2006 Group Letter, Bridge the Gap/Nuclear Information & Resource Service news release, DHS Federal Register notice, December 2004 Goup Letter to DHS and EPA

US Department of Homeland Security Dirty Bomb Cleanup Guidance published Jan 3, 2006 would allow radiation levels that will cause cancer in 1 in every 3 to 4 people exposed for 30 years, using National Academy of Sciences BEIR VII or EPA risk estimates. NIRS Press Release. January 4, 2006.

January 27-28, 2005: Two letters were submitted to Dept of Homeland Security (DHS) Director Ridge and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Leavitt from 54 national, state and regional organizations representing thousands of people working to clean up toxic and radioactive waste pollution. They oppose the expected DHS guidance for dirty bomb "cleanup" levels that would permit contamination that would cause cancer in a quarter of the population exposed (over 30 years after the attack). The groups note in their letter that, "The guidance, which is expected to be published for comment shortly, is absolutely unacceptable as it would permit dangerously contaminated sites and serve as a precedent for weakening the EPA's existing cleanup standards, especially at Superfund sites."
Letter to DHS Director Ridge | Letter to EPA Administrator Leavitt

Multigroup letter to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Ridge regarding dangerously lax proposed “dirty bomb” cleanup standards.

Multigroup letter to EPA Administrator Mike Leavitt regarding proposed “dirty bomb” cleanup standards and EPA radiation standards.

Tables comparing proposed dirty bomb cleanup standards to EPA standards.

Summary of US Environmental Protection Agency standards.

Radiation Affects Animals, Plants and the Environment as well as Humans

Overview of Radiation and Animals.

NIRS is concerned about national and international efforts to legalize or justify radiation exposure to animals and the environment. The Department of Energy has a “biota” project underway to assess and allow leaving radioactivity that contaminates the environment on which animals and plants rely. The International Atomic Energy Agency is also moving in this direction, as are some other nation’s nuclear regulators. In the same way assumptions about radiation impacts on the “standard man” have been misused to justify radiation to people, now a “standard” fish or mammal is being suggested to represent and justify exposures to all species. Read more here.