Nuclear Information and Resource Service home


 
Share |
Radiation - home


Take Action!


Campaigns


Nuclear Monitor

 

Nuclear Crisis in Japan

Also follow us on:
dailykos NIRS blog    Youtube

 


“There is no safe level of exposure and there is no dose of (ionizing) radiation so low that the risk of a malignancy is zero”--Dr. Karl Morgan, the father of Health Physics

Radiation is energy that travels in waves. It includes visible light, ultraviolet light, radio waves and other forms, including particles. Each type of radiation has different properties. Non-ionizing radiation can shake or move molecules. Ionizing radiation can actually break molecular bonds, causing unpredictable chemical reactions. Our Radiation Basics (PDF) fact sheet walks the layperson through what radiation is, where it comes from, types of radiation, half-lives and how it can affect humans.

Radiation and Children: The Ignored Victims (PDF) reveals how national radiation protection standards fall short of protecting those most vulnerable to the harmful effects of radiation. It discusses how “standard man”, the ubiquitous model for radiation damage, is not sufficient and why these standards are unenforceable and, therefore, unprotective.

Radiation: The Myth of the Millirem fact sheet discusses conventional ways of measuring radiation the units used, and their shortcomings. It also makes the argument that a “permissible” dose doesn’t mean the dose is safe.

The paper Conflicting Mandates, Co-Opted Studies: International Atomic Energy Agency and the World Health Organization outlines how the IAEA’s mandate to spread “peaceful” uses of nuclear technology conflicts with the WHO’s need to perform unbiased health studies, especially in the aftermath of Chernobyl.

We include a bibliography of studies presenting health effects connected with radiation and a graph illustrating the increase in various diseases.

The European Committee on Radiation Risk was formed in 1997 by the European Parliament as an entity independent from all other Radiation Committees. Parliament agreed there was enough available evidence showing that low-level exposure to man-made radiation caused ill health and that models used by ICRP failed to predict these effects. The resulting report, 2003 Recommendations of the European Committee on Radiation Risk (PDF), addresses not only the science behind the low-dose debate, but also the ethical basis for allowable radiation exposures. If society is ever to have the badly-needed debate on effects of low-doses and dose rates of ionizing radiation, it must challenge the very basis of radiation dose and risk assessment. This report does. Not a moment too soon. For the Nuclear Monitor summary click here. PDF


Hot News

rosalie bertell
In Memory of
Dr. Sr. Rosalie Bertell
1929- 2012

remembrance by Diane D'Arrigo of NIRS.

April 2012: Atomic Radiation is More Harmful to Women. 2-page handout.

October 2011: Atomic Radiation is More Harmful to Women. PDF NIRS Briefing Paper.

EPA Moves to Relax US Radiation Standards

More information:

Important new paper for anti-fracking activists: Radon in the Marcellus Shale, from Dr. Marvin Resnikoff of Radioactive Waste Management Associates. January 2012

Important article on studies of childhood leukemia and cancers near German reactors. Childhood Leukemia and Cancers Near German Nuclear Reactors: Significance, Context, and Ramifications of Recent Studies, PDF Rudi Nussbaum, Journal of Occupational Environmental Health. July-September, 2009.

Nuclear Waste Isolation Means Zero Release of Radioactivity PDF

US Radiation Panel Recognizes No Safe Dose of Radiation (July 2005)PDF

Dirty Bomb Cleanup

No such thing as a safe dose of radiation, PDF 79.26KB June 2006


gofman