Stop Fukushima Freeways!
A new campaign to expose the perils of the massive and unnecessary radioactive waste transportation that would occur across the U.S. if the moribund and scientifically-indefensible Yucca Mountain, Nevada waste dump were to be revived and/or a centralized "interim" storage site--basically a nuclear waste cask parking lot--were to be licensed.
Organizing and educational resources; expert and technical documents, and much more here.
Women and Radiation
Research by NIRS' Mary Olson demonstrates that women and girls are more susceptible to the effects of radiation than men and boys. On May 5, 2015, Olson gave a presentation about these issues at a United Nations meeting in New York on Gender and Nuclear Weapons.
Text of presentation
Slides from presentation
August 19, 2015: Tell NRC to reject efforts by pro-nuclear fanatics to weaken radiation protection standards.
A campaign to close the aging, dangerous Indian Point reactors near New York City and build a clean, sustainable and affordable nuclear-free, carbon-free energy system for all New York.
October 22, 2015
NIRS/AGREE analysis finds FitzPatrick reactor can be replaced with clean & renewable energy at a lower cost
Press release; full analysis
October 13, 2015
NIRS statement on Pilgrim reactor closure announcement--Four more years is too long.
Statement of Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) on Pilgrim shutdown.
October 15, 2015: Letter to NRC from Massachusetts Congressional delegation insisting that NRC ensure Entergy has adequate financial resources for operation/decommissioning of Pilgrim; that agency does not reduce Emergency Planning Zone; that NRC require Entergy to provide assistance to Pilgrim workers, and more.
September 2, 2015
Defend the denial! Act now to urge DC officials to reject any settlement or reconsideration of fundamentally-flawed Exelon-Pepco merger.
August 25, 2015
DC Public Service Commission rejects Exelon's proposed takeover of Pepco
August 2, 2015
Great news about nukes and the Clean Power Plan.
GreenWorld, NIRS' blog, is at www.safeenergy.org
When a campaign strikes a nerve
November 30, 2015
Every successful campaign for social change causes reaction. After all, if the campaign weren’t hitting at vested interests, weren’t causing disruption for some entity, then there would be no need for a campaign--its goals would simply be adopted by acclamation.
Indeed, campaigns that don’t generate reaction are campaigns that don’t succeed: that means they haven’t attained enough attention or backing to matter to their targets.
Thus, it’s always a source of initial gratification when, after launching a new campaign, reaction sets in. When you can see you’ve struck a nerve. When your opposition attacks you directly. And that high point is elevated further when the best attack your opposition can muster is one against the least important of your arguments.
So it is that the international Don’t Nuke the Climate Campaign, for which NIRS is the U.S. member, last week began feeling that warm gratification, that recognition that we are beginning to have an impact. Because we’ve been attacked by name for the first–but surely not the last–time.
Continue reading at www.safeenergy.org
November 23, 2015
Nuking clean energy: how nuclear power makes wind and solar harder
This post first appeared on Power for the People, a blog focused on energy issues in Virginia, the home base of Dominion Resources--a company that is an industry laggard when it comes to renewable energy issues, and is still pursuing the possibility of building a third nuclear reactor at its North Anna site despite its costs projection of around $19 Billion, which would make it the most expensive nuclear project ever undertaken in the U.S. Those projections are not far off the costs anticipated for the UK’s highly controversial Hinkley Point reactor and, given the near-certainty of cost overruns and schedule delays, could go far higher if construction is attempted.
In this piece, Ivy Main explains--I think much more clearly than I have to date--exactly how deployment of expensive nuclear power (and baseload power generally) prevents the growth of cleaner, safer and cheaper renewable energy sources. And it’s not true only in Virginia; while that state has a higher percentage of nuclear than many, meaning that it is closer to the point where nuclear blocks out renewables, the problem is real in every nuclear-powered state--and nation--to one degree or another. This is the key reason why nuclear power is counterproductive in the battle to forestall global warming: renewables are faster to deploy and can provide low-carbon power more cheaply than nuclear–both necessities if we are to prevent the worst of climate change’s impacts.
Dominion Resources CEO Tom Farrell is famously bullish on nuclear energy as a clean solution in a carbon-constrained economy, but he’s got it wrong. Nuclear is a barrier to a clean-energy future, not a piece of it. That’s only partly because new nuclear is so expensive that there’s little room left in a utility budget to build wind and solar. A more fundamental problem is that when nuclear is part of the energy mix, high levels of wind and solar become harder to achieve.
Continue reading at www.safeenergy.org
COP 21 Don't Nuke the Climate! organizing and resources page.
Take action! Join climate actions November 29 in cities across the world! Help make the nuclear-free, carbon-free message visible and vibrant. It's the essential element to our planet's future.
August 4, 2015. Huge Victory! Final EPA Clean Power Plan removes most pro-nuclear provisions, withdraws support for existing reactors, recognizes nuclear power will play little role in addressing climate. Talking points. Letter to NIRS supporters.
Sign the Don't Nuke the Climate! petition.
Pope Francis' Encyclical on climate includes several passages highly skeptical of nuclear power as a technology, and thus as a climate solution. Excerpts here.
Don't Nuke the Climate telebriefing: lessons from Japan and Germany. Featuring Amory Lovins and Tim Judson with Michael Mariotte moderating. June 30, 2015. mp3 file.
Fact sheet: Nuclear Power and Climate: Why Nukes Can't Save the Planet.
Briefing Paper: Nuclear Energy is Dirty Energy (and does not fit in a clean energy standard). pdf
Briefing Paper: Killing the Competition. How nuclear industry is attempting to block climate action, stop renewable energy and subsidize old reactors. pdf
Report: Power Shift: The Deployment of a 21st Century Electricity Sector and the Nuclear War to Stop It. Describes how the nuclear power industry is seeking consumer bailouts for its uneconomic reactors while working to undermine adoption of clean renewable energy.